US Supreme Court Upholds Texas Law Requiring ID Verification for Porn Sites

US Supreme Court upholds Texas law requiring ID verification for porn sites. Ultimately, the justices voted 6-3 along ideological lines in a decision released on Friday. Texas has defended the law, saying it was created to limit harm to minors. More than a dozen other states have passed similar laws.

The 2023 law was challenged by PornHub and other sites that argued the requirement violated constitutional rights to free speech by placing a burden on adults who want to access that content. The US Supreme Court has upheld a Texas law that requires users accessing pornography sites to verify their age using a government ID or a face scan.

\"The power to require age verification is within a State's authority to prevent children from accessing sexually explicit content,\" Justice Clarence Thomas, who authored the opinion, wrote. In a two-hour hearing in January, the justices had appeared to agree with Texas that some form of safeguards should be in place to protect minors, but they also expressed concern about trampling on free speech rights.

Lawyers for the pornography websites in the case primarily relied on legal precedent in their arguments. They pointed to a 2004 Supreme Court decision, which ruled against an attempt to criminalise content on the internet that may be harmful to minors. They also argued that asking users to submit identifying information may inadvertently bar adults from accessing their websites, effectively impeding on their First Amendment rights.

\"Adults who submit, for example, a 'government ID' over the Internet to 'affirmatively identify themselves' understand that they are thereby exposing themselves to 'inadvertent disclosures, leaks, or hacks,'\" the adult film industry argued in their legal filings. Critics also expressed concern about whether the law could be used to restrict other kinds of content intended for adults.

Texas lawyers, meanwhile, leaned on another legal precedent: a 1968 Supreme Court decision that upheld a New York law barring the sale of pornographic magazines to those who are underage. State lawyers argued that the principles of that law have not changed \"just because obscenity has moved online\".

According to the source: BBC.